Johannesburg -
In the wake of the EFF's humiliating backfire on farm murder statistics – where their own demand for race-disaggregated police data confirmed that wh farmers are killed at 11 to 12 times the rate of bl farmers – another damning collection of evidence has emerged. Titled "Wall of Hate: Confronting 2,400 Screenshots of Anti-wh Hate Speech in South Africa" by The 47th Edition, this exhaustive archive lays bare the scale of racial animus directed at wh South Africans, particularly Afrkanr farmers and communities.
The document compiles over 2,400 documented examples of explicit anti-wh slurs, threats, calls for violence, and dehumanising rhetoric flooding South African social media, political rallies, and public discourse. These are not isolated rants from fringe trolls. Many originate from supporters, influencers, and leaders aligned with radical leftist and bl nationalist movements – chief among them the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).
This "Wall of Hate" arrives at a critical moment. Just as the EFF pushed for SAPS farm murder stats hoping to debunk claims of targeted persecution against wh farmers, the data instead validated the disproportionate vulnerability: whs on farms face murder rates 11–12 times higher than bls in the same settings. Now, the screenshots provide the ideological fuel behind that disparity – a relentless drumbeat of hatred that normalises violence against a specific racial minority.
— The 47th Edition (@47thPress) April 6, 2026
The Scale of the Venom
The collection is relentless in its documentation: screenshots of tweets, Facebook posts, WhatsApp messages, TikTok videos, and rally chants. Common themes include:
- Direct calls to "Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer" – the EFF's favourite struggle song, repeatedly performed by Julius Malema to stadium-sized crowds.
- Phrases like "wh people must die," "Cut the throat of whness," or fantasies of repeating Zimbabwe-style land seizures with added bloodshed.
- Dehumanising tropes: whs as "settlers," "colonisers," "thieves" who deserve expropriation, expulsion, or worse.
- Celebration of farm attacks, with gloating over murdered farmers and their families.
These are not abstract political opinions. In a country with South Africa's murder rate, such rhetoric doesn't stay online. It seeps into the minds of disaffected youth, criminals, and those already primed by political messaging. The EFF's own Equality Court convictions for hate speech – including Malema's 2022 rally remarks urging supporters never to be "scared to kill" in the context of confrontations involving wh people – fit seamlessly into this pattern. Courts have repeatedly flagged similar statements as crossing into incitement, yet the party defends them as "cultural" or "revolutionary."
The 2,400+ screenshots represent only a fraction of what circulates daily. They form a digital monument to the double standard: while generic crime is lamented, anti-wh hatred is often excused as "punching up" or legitimate historical grievance. The EFF and its fellow travellers have built their brand on exactly this – stoking racial resentment to mobilise votes while denying any link to real-world consequences.
Linking the Hate to the Bloodshed
The previous EFF stunt with police statistics was meant to prove Donald Trump's warnings wrong. Instead, the SAPS data showed wh farmers dying at massively elevated per-capita rates. Brutal attacks frequently involve torture, rape, and gratuitous violence – patterns that go far beyond opportunistic robbery.
When a political movement's leader repeatedly leads chants of "Kill the Boer," when their supporters flood social media with eliminationist fantasies (as catalogued in the Wall of Hate), and when farm murder rates for whs remain disproportionately high, the causal connection becomes hard to dismiss. Rhetoric creates a permissive climate. It dehumanises the target group, making violence against them seem justified or even heroic to some.
The EFF cannot credibly claim innocence here. They demanded the stats to "disprove" persecution – and got confirmation of the disparity. They traffic in the very hate speech documented across thousands of screenshots. Their response to both? Denial, deflection, and doubling down. Malema continues the songs. Supporters continue the posts. And South African farmers – overwhelmingly wh commercial producers who feed the nation – continue to live under siege.
Condemning the EFF: Architects of Division
The EFF's ideology is not about economic freedom or fighting poverty. It is racial grievance weaponised. They push for land expropriation without compensation targeted at wh owners. They glorify "revolution" that explicitly frames whs as the enemy. They celebrate figures and slogans that history has shown lead to disaster (see Zimbabwe's collapse under Mugabe, whom Malema has praised).
The Wall of Hate is not "just words." In South Africa, words have preceded action before. The archive stands as receipts against those who claim anti-wh racism is a myth or "wh fragility." It documents a sustained campaign of psychological warfare against a minority that still contributes disproportionately to agriculture, the economy, and food security.
Every screenshot mocking murdered farmers, every chant calling for their death, adds to the wall. The EFF sits at the centre of this ecosystem – not as passive participants, but as amplifiers and instigators.
Time to Tear Down the Wall
South Africa cannot heal while this Wall of Hate stands unchallenged. Honest governance requires condemning incitement regardless of the source. It requires protecting all citizens, including the wh farming community facing statistically disproportionate murder risks. It requires rejecting the EFF's politics of envy and elimination.
The police farm murder stats and the 2,400+ screenshots together paint a consistent picture: a minority under sustained rhetorical and physical assault. The EFF wanted to disprove the crisis. They have instead helped document it – first through their failed stats request, now through the broader culture of hatred their movement fosters.
The 47th Edition's "Wall of Hate" is a public service. It forces South Africans and the world to confront what polite denialism tries to hide. wh South Africans are not perpetual villains; they are citizens under threat. The EFF's brand of radicalism does not liberate – it divides, incites, and ultimately destroys.
It's past time to condemn the EFF not just for one backfired political stunt, but for their central role in building and maintaining South Africa's Wall of Hate. The data, the screenshots, and the blood on the farms demand nothing less.
Comments (0)
Leave a Comment