Who cares who boycotts Dis-Chem now. South Africa is drowning in real crises—crippling unemployment, daily load-shedding blackouts, violent crime epidemics, failing hospitals, and an ANC government that has looted the state for decades. Yet the professional outrage brigade on the left has zeroed in on their newest villain: Dis-Chem. Not for stocking shortages or pricing scandals, but because a major shareholder had the audacity to challenge pro-Palestine propaganda on social media. This isn't activism; it's a textbook display of leftist intolerance, weaponised cancel culture, and rank hypocrisy that exposes their priorities as performative virtue-signalling over genuine principle.
Mark Saltzman, son of Dis-Chem founders and a significant shareholder (but explicitly not a director, employee, or company spokesperson), clashed with journalist Redi Tlhabi over Gaza. He accused her of peddling misinformation and anti-Jewish bias, using blunt, heated language including calling her a "demented b*tch" amid the exchange. The left's response? Instant meltdown. Hashtags exploded, BDS zealots issued fatwas, and ordinary South Africans were pressured to boycott a homegrown company that actually delivers jobs, medicine, and economic value. Dis-Chem correctly distanced itself, stressing its apolitical stance and local philanthropy. But facts never slow down the mob.
Leftist Selective Outrage on Steroids
The dominant narrative frames Saltzman's pushback as unforgivable "misogyny" and "genocide denial," demanding corporate punishment for private views. Spare us. Where was this ferocious energy when Hamas terrorists slaughtered, raped, and burned Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023, while parading hostages and embedding themselves among Gazan civilians? Crickets. Islamist groups with charters explicitly calling for Jewish extermination get euphemisms like "resistance," while Israel's right to defend itself triggers endless accusations of "Zionist genocide."
This is the same crowd that stays silent on actual horrors: mass rapes and executions by Boko Haram, slavery in Sudan and Mauritania, honour killings across the Middle East, or the Uyghur genocide in China. South Africa's own backyard? Forgotten. Farm murders, township gang violence claiming thousands of Black lives yearly, and state failure that keeps millions trapped in poverty elicit far less Twitter fury than a shareholder's spicy reply to a journalist. The left's moral compass doesn't point to consistent human rights—it points at Israel and Jews, full stop.
BDS activists and their allies love invoking "apartheid" analogies while cheering actual authoritarian regimes. They demand boycotts of Jewish-linked businesses but shop happily at stores tied to regimes with rivers of blood on their hands. Tlhabi's vocal pro-Palestine stance is protected speech—fine. But turning a social media spat into collective economic punishment against thousands of uninvolved workers and customers reveals the authoritarian streak beneath the "justice" rhetoric. Disagree with the narrative? Then you, your family business, and your livelihood must be destroyed. Classic leftist playbook.
Remember how Dischem said no whites allowed to work there? Sorry Dischem, you are on your own now. Even the white man had enough of your bullshit. pic.twitter.com/MCbt3kfcEL
— WesternPulse (@WesternPulse88) May 21, 2026
Dis-Chem’s Past Anti-White Job Policy: The Hypocrisy Runs Deep
Let’s not forget Dis-Chem’s own ugly history. In 2022, CEO Ivan Saltzman issued a notorious internal memo imposing a blatant "no whites" moratorium on hiring and promotions to chase BEE targets. It was naked racial discrimination against white South Africans, with managers’ bonuses and performance reviews tied to excluding them. The backlash was swift and brutal — lost sales, plummeting share price, and public outrage forced the company to withdraw the policy and apologise for its "wording and tone."
Yet the same leftists now screaming for a boycott over a shareholder’s tweet were largely silent or defensive when Dis-Chem was openly practising anti-white racism. To them, discriminating against whites is "transformation" and perfectly acceptable. Only when a Jewish shareholder defends Israel does corporate punishment become a moral imperative. This double standard exposes the left’s selective racism: anti-white policies at home are progressive; pro-Israel views are unforgivable.
But this is the wording of Saltzman? Yet Dischem vouches for only black jobs? Sorry Dischem. Save yourself, the white man also had enough of your racial bullshit.
You are racist to both groups.
pppppfttt.
The Real Victims: South Africans, Not Distant Propaganda
Boycotting Dis-Chem is economic self-sabotage. This company employs thousands, supplies essential healthcare in a country where public clinics are disasters, and built its success through entrepreneurship—not government tenders or corruption. Punishing it over a shareholder's views hurts Black cashiers, pharmacists, suppliers, and working families who rely on it daily. In a nation with youth unemployment over 40%, prioritising foreign conflicts over local bread-and-butter issues is the height of elite detachment.
Leftist narratives paint this as noble solidarity with Palestinians. Reality: Hamas diverts aid into tunnels and rockets, rejects peace offers, and uses civilians as shields—facts routinely downplayed or denied. Civilian deaths are tragic, but blaming Israel for urban warfare it didn't start ignores Hamas's strategy of maximising its own casualties for PR wins. Saltzman's frustration targeted what he saw as one-sided, inflammatory coverage. In any sane society, that's debate. To the left, it's heresy warranting destruction.
This echoes broader patterns: vilifying successful (often minority) entrepreneurs the moment they stray from progressive dogma. Jewish contributions to South African business, medicine, and even the anti-apartheid movement are airbrushed away when inconvenient. Accusations of "Zionist philanthropy" controlling narratives revive ugly antisemitic tropes about money and influence—tropes the left claims to abhor elsewhere but deploys freely here.
Time to Reject the Manufactured Outrage
Free societies allow blunt speech, even rude speech. They don't empower mobs to bankrupt companies over tweets. If the left truly cared about Palestine, they'd pressure Hamas to release hostages, stop using human shields, and accept coexistence rather than endless jihad. Instead, they export their cultural revolution to South African soil, damaging local jobs while achieving nothing substantive abroad.
South Africans should see this for what it is: a distraction from fixing our collapsing nation. Support Dis-Chem if it meets your needs. Reject the boycott culture that targets success and dissent. The leftist narrative isn't about peace or humanity—it's about enforcing ideological conformity through economic terror.
Who cares who boycotts Dis-Chem? Real South Africans have far bigger problems. Push back. Prioritise South Africa. Reason over rage.
Comments (0)
Leave a Comment